I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was developing more stress and was slower as opposed to previous things. I do not recall if I even tried out common h4831 or not; I am wondering not.

I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was developing more pressure and was slower compared to the outdated stuff. I don't keep in mind if I even tried regular h4831 or not; I am considering not. Click to broaden...

It truly is possible that no further discussion is needed, wherein scenario we propose starting a completely new thread. If even so you are feeling your reaction is needed you are able to nevertheless achieve this.

We’d like to make certain that you’re 18 many years of age or older ahead of letting you to buy our web-site. Will you be eighteen a long time of age or older?

Anyway, I knew the two kilos of H4831SC used exactly the same data, but I did not know irrespective of whether there was nearly anything different among a pound of powder labeled "Serious" and one particular not so labeled. A connect with to Hodgdon verified they were in reality similar and the one change was The emblem on the label.

I know, rough moments. H4831SC will certainly operate, I just did not like the case density when loaded long. I do not try to remember powder demand off the highest of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that's in which I typically aim to be. Inside your case employing what you've (and what I ought to have performed) I'd start with the top on the bearing surface area of the bullet ideal with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you locate a velocity h4831sc load data node.

If there's no load data it is actually since this powder is not really ideal for this cartridge. Generally one particular will not likely discover one particular powder to suit all cartridges, and also the household of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you are asking about isn't going to function.

Like mentioned earlier mentioned, same things. All that differs is the size of the kernels. I did listen to someplace that they are going to only make the SC in the future. I do not know if that is genuine or not but would make sense to me. I take advantage of SC because which is what I present in the 8 h4831 vs h4831sc lb jug and it works.

It's possible you'll either: 1) Proceed and also have the firearm(s) shown down below immediately removed from your purchasing cart:

Furthermore, it goes on to mention that due to fshorter h4831sc grains, that load density is likely to be marginally increased.

I've experienced identical encounter with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not shoot properly with just about anything except Fed215's. Some elements just Really don't play nicely with other. Appears like you have chosen 3 excellent powders, I might be expecting at least one of them to shoot.

The "SC" stands for Shorter Cut. I have not observed a distinction between both powder dut I do not Consider I might mix them.

A number of the outdated Lyman data just shown IMR 4831, which was surplus navy powder and now newer mfg as H4831.

NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Use a restricted offer of Varget, along with a ton much more readily available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Pretty much exclusively, mainly because that's exactly what the rifles shoot the best.