Speak to your point out and native rules for that age constraints and legality of purchasing and possessing these products. For safety explanations, we don't accept returns on powder. Due to Specific transport needs for these goods, an additional $twenty five.fifty Harmful Material demand might be used for almost any get that contains flammable materials. Contiguous forty eight states only. For US sale only.

H4831SC Powder obtainable in inventory now. Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain measurement, as a result, the designation SC or shorter Minimize. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels enable the powder to stream in the powder measures far more easily, assisting to relieve the consistent cutting of granules.

The point that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is specifically why you're observing better velocities obtained with that powder, instead of Anything you've viewed While using the IMR things. Also good powder, but to some degree greater suited to marginally smaller situations by using a bit much less capability.

Using the 154 grain Hornady SP inside the 280, H4831 gave me excellent groups and good velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a appreciably bigger velocity and presents marginally superior precision. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos from the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally better. Consequently, in Each and every of those scenarios I went with An additional powder, but I would definitely dislike to divest myself of the H4831.

INgunner54 stated: It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Discovered a node and shot some groups.

I understand, tough instances. H4831SC will definitely perform, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded prolonged. I don't bear in mind powder cost off the top of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps and that is where I usually intention for being. With your case using what you've got (and what I ought to have finished) I'd personally get started with the tip from the bearing surface from the bullet correct with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you finally locate a velocity node.

I have used h4831sc load data both equally and employed the exact same costs and also have not been in a position to convey to any noticable variances with overall performance. the SC Model meters slightly smoother is about all. any feedback??

If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you could locate a load that works Okay With all the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were about 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the regular fourteen" twist. The h4831 vs h4831sc 70-grain Speer was the most significant bullet that may stabilize, nonetheless it did that superbly. It is a humorous-looking bullet using a rounded nose profile, but it surely shoots fantastic and kills properly. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down immediately with rib-cage hits.

Any load data to assist that? My to start with assumed is it isn't likely to burn off all the way and velocities will be sluggish and all over. May be a nice fireworks Display screen!

Liberalism; The difficult nevertheless acknowledged notion that it's totally achievable to pick up a turd via the cleanse conclude.

As to the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the identical/similar powder cept for grain sizing. Load data is interchangeable.

Again to outdated internet site Near If there is anything in your cart, it won't be brought over to the aged web-site.

rayporter stated: i never recognized a variation apart from the regular is like rolling cordwood on to the the h4831sc pan. Click to extend...

Not surprisingly, sitting down all over for twenty+ several years (I am aware a man who remains to be using the H4831 he bought within the 60s), means that burn rates will most likely transform a smidge, and new manufacture things will likely be a little diverse way too.